Fri, 17 Feb, 2012
Encroachment, a great number of the grand old monkey puzzles ring-barked and herbicided, a missing stand of cycads, and the tallest cycad ringed. These are just a few of the incidents that have occurred during Rhodes University’s tenure as custodians of our local botanical gardens.
I personally witnessed an overall-clad gang having a go at one of the Araucarias. They explained to me that the trees had been condemned as “aliens”. Yet, surely the purpose of a botanical garden is to showcase global biodiversity and the centuries-old Araucaria are not invaders? (In fact, it just so happens that these particular aliens are on the International Union for Conservation of Nature red list, in addition to being
listed by Cites [an international treaty drawn up in 1973 to protect wildlife against over-exploitation].
Monkey puzzles are, furthermore, an integral part of the character of the gardens, consequently the city’s heritage.
Everyone knows that harming a cycad, or ‘relocating’ one without a permit, is completely illegal. The first attempt on the tall cycad was to set it alight. When that failed, the bark was removed, a large number of cuts initially being evident.
The Department of Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism confirmed that no permit for the missing stand of cycads has ever been issued and it is easy to dismiss as plausible the theory that the damage is the work of nameless, faceless bark-strippers who seek “muti”. The substance on the trunks of the Araucarias (visible in the photographs) doesn’t have the appearance of any sealer I know. It looks like herbicide, or diesel. Severely burnt cycad bark is also not known to be the preferred faire of your average bark-stripper. Have you ever come across a bark-stripper who starts his work on the difficult part, bending over, or one who cuts a neat line above and below and stops at the buttress roots?
Not so long ago, Rhodes University attempted to build on our botanical gardens in the name of “environmental education”. The mind boggles. That part of the garden is a monument and the title deed is, of course, completely meaningless in the context of a centuries-old public use area; especially when a ‘sale price’ of R1 is in no way commensurate with the value of the land.
While it is the university’s prerogative to continue sacrificing large quantities of Clivias on its own north–facing slopes, surely it is time for some accountability so far as our botanical gardens are concerned? By “the buck stops somewhere” is not meant your taxes. (I am, of course, referring here to a rampant rumour that several millions are claimed to have been spent on cutting the grass, sweeping the path, etc.)
Dr Simon Childs